Differences between Japanese Jiu Jitsu and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
Jiu Jitsu, a martial art focused on flexibility and smoothness, has been divided into two main branches: Japanese Jiu Jitsu and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu (BJJ) . Despite sharing a common ancestor, each style has evolved uniquely, reflecting differences in philosophy, technique and application.
Origins and History
Japanese Jiu Jitsu : This martial art, dating back centuries in Japan, was developed by samurai to defend themselves without weapons. It includes throwing techniques, holds, chokes and strikes, in addition to the use of traditional weapons.
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu : BJJ, which emerged in Brazil in the 1920s, places a strong emphasis on ground combat. It was popularized by the Gracie family and focuses on submission techniques.
Philosophy and Approach
Japanese Jiu Jitsu: Promotes the use of the opponent's strength against him, with a focus on both standing and ground techniques. This style also focuses on personal development and discipline.
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu: Focuses on mastering ground combat, teaching practitioners to subdue larger opponents using specialized techniques.
Techniques and Training
Japanese Jiu Jitsu: Offers a varied repertoire that includes striking, throwing, and weapon defenses, with a focus on fluid transitions between techniques.
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu: Specializes in grappling and ground techniques, with an emphasis on control positions and transitions.
Competition and Practical Application
Japanese Jiu Jitsu: Although there are competitions, many schools prioritize the traditional aspect and application in self-defense.
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu: Competition plays a crucial role, with tournaments promoting submissions and control on the ground.
Conclusion
Japanese Jiu Jitsu preserves the rich tradition and versatility of samurai techniques, while Brazilian Jiu Jitsu adapts to modernity, focusing on ground combat. Both styles offer valuable lessons in self-defense and personal development.
?
